linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] i2c: npcm: Modify the client address assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zvv2Y10hJqGnUDvW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 16:17:23 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tyrone Ting <warp5tw@...il.com>
Cc: avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com,
	venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
	andi.shyti@...nel.org, wsa@...nel.org, rand.sec96@...il.com,
	wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, tali.perry@...oton.com,
	Avi.Fishman@...oton.com, tomer.maimon@...oton.com,
	KWLIU@...oton.com, JJLIU0@...oton.com, kfting@...oton.com,
	openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] i2c: npcm: Modify the client address assignment

On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 02:28:53PM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote:
> From: Tyrone Ting <kfting@...oton.com>
> 
> Store the client address earlier since it might get called in
> the i2c_recover_bus() logic flow at the early stage of
> npcm_i2c_master_xfer().

...

> +	/*
> +	 * Previously, the address was stored w/o left-shift by one bit and
> +	 * with that shift in the following call to npcm_i2c_master_start_xmit().
> +	 *
> +	 * Since there are cases that the i2c_recover_bus() gets called at the
> +	 * early stage of npcm_i2c_master_xfer(), the address is stored with
> +	 * the shift and used in the i2c_recover_bus().
> +	 *
> +	 * The address is stored from bit 1 to bit 7 in the register for
> +	 * sending the i2c address later so it's left-shifted by 1 bit.
> +	 */
> +	bus->dest_addr = slave_addr << 1;

I'm wondering if it's better to use i2c_8bit_addr_from_msg() here?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko