linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] hexagon: Don't select GENERIC_IOMAP without HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60294f0b70dc1f5f04cd32e43c7c13ccb2ff4374.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 13:54:26 +0200
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>
Cc: "linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heiko
 Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hexagon: Don't select GENERIC_IOMAP without
 HAS_IOPORT support

On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 09:34 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, at 08:04, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 16:35 +0000, Brian Cain wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > With 2 more of my HAS_IOPORT patches having gone into v6.12-rc1 I just
> > > > noticed that this one seems to have fallen into the cracks. This is
> > > > probably my fault for not properly confirming that I'd be happy for you
> > > > to take it. Do you want me to resend a new version rebased on v6.12-
> > > > rc1?
> > > 
> > > Oh, sorry!  Yes, if you could resend a rebased one I'll make sure I am able to land it.
> > > 
> > > -Brian
> > 
> > Hi Brian,
> > 
> > I just tried with
> > 
> >    b4 shazam '<20240403132447.719833-2-schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>'
> > 
> > and this patch actually still applies cleanly and matches the result I
> > got rebasing the whole series[0]. So on second thought taking it from
> > here directly might still be the easiest. That said I'll have to send
> > out the other 4 outstanding patches required for the final inb()
> > compile time switch, so if you prefer I can still resend too.
> 
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> For simplicity I would suggest you keep all the remaining patches
> as a series now and I'll take them through the asm-generic
> tree in order to get them in more easily along with the final patch.
> 
>       Arnd

Hi Arnd,

Works for me. So, I think apart from this one that was simply missed
and has an Ack the Bluetooth patch hasn't seen any feedback, for the
drm one I have a few minor todos and then there is the tty/serial one.

So maybe I can just sent a version of all the remaining ones and add
all the remaining maintainers for the whole series. I'll include a note
that we plan on taking this through asm-generic.

Thanks,
Niklas