linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] hexagon: Don't select GENERIC_IOMAP without HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <75ea0839-1489-4f49-abcd-104e657a42c5@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:34:37 +0000
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "Brian Cain" <bcain@...cinc.com>
Cc: "linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Heiko Carstens" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hexagon: Don't select GENERIC_IOMAP without HAS_IOPORT support

On Tue, Oct 1, 2024, at 08:04, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 16:35 +0000, Brian Cain wrote:
>> > 
>> > With 2 more of my HAS_IOPORT patches having gone into v6.12-rc1 I just
>> > noticed that this one seems to have fallen into the cracks. This is
>> > probably my fault for not properly confirming that I'd be happy for you
>> > to take it. Do you want me to resend a new version rebased on v6.12-
>> > rc1?
>> 
>> Oh, sorry!  Yes, if you could resend a rebased one I'll make sure I am able to land it.
>> 
>> -Brian
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> I just tried with
>
>    b4 shazam '<20240403132447.719833-2-schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>'
>
> and this patch actually still applies cleanly and matches the result I
> got rebasing the whole series[0]. So on second thought taking it from
> here directly might still be the easiest. That said I'll have to send
> out the other 4 outstanding patches required for the final inb()
> compile time switch, so if you prefer I can still resend too.

Hi Niklas,

For simplicity I would suggest you keep all the remaining patches
as a series now and I'll take them through the asm-generic
tree in order to get them in more easily along with the final patch.

      Arnd