[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6e1fce8-2813-4829-b17a-aebe37997327@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:48:41 +0200
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: pali@...nel.org, dilinger@...ued.net, lenb@...nel.org,
hdegoede@...hat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/3] ACPI: battery: Simplify battery hook
locking
Am 02.10.24 um 14:06 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 11:28 PM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de> wrote:
>> Move the conditional locking from __battery_hook_unregister()
>> into battery_hook_unregister() and rename the low-level function
>> to simplify the locking during battery hook removal.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Well, "looks good to me" doesn't usually mean "Reviewed-by", but you
> can retain the tag in this particular case.
>
> But in the future please don't add Reviewed-by or Acked-by tags from
> people to patches if you have not actually received those tags.
Sorry, it seems that i mixed up the Reviewed-by tags. I will try to be a bit
more careful next time.
Armin Wolf
>> Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>> index f4599261cfc3..dda59ee5a11e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>> @@ -703,28 +703,28 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_battery_list);
>> static LIST_HEAD(battery_hook_list);
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(hook_mutex);
>>
>> -static void __battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook, int lock)
>> +static void battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook)
>> {
>> struct acpi_battery *battery;
>> +
>> /*
>> * In order to remove a hook, we first need to
>> * de-register all the batteries that are registered.
>> */
>> - if (lock)
>> - mutex_lock(&hook_mutex);
>> list_for_each_entry(battery, &acpi_battery_list, list) {
>> if (!hook->remove_battery(battery->bat, hook))
>> power_supply_changed(battery->bat);
>> }
>> list_del(&hook->list);
>> - if (lock)
>> - mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex);
>> +
>> pr_info("extension unregistered: %s\n", hook->name);
>> }
>>
>> void battery_hook_unregister(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook)
>> {
>> - __battery_hook_unregister(hook, 1);
>> + mutex_lock(&hook_mutex);
>> + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook);
>> + mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_unregister);
>>
>> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ void battery_hook_register(struct acpi_battery_hook *hook)
>> * hooks.
>> */
>> pr_err("extension failed to load: %s", hook->name);
>> - __battery_hook_unregister(hook, 0);
>> + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook);
>> goto end;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static void battery_hook_add_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery)
>> */
>> pr_err("error in extension, unloading: %s",
>> hook_node->name);
>> - __battery_hook_unregister(hook_node, 0);
>> + battery_hook_unregister_unlocked(hook_node);
>> }
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&hook_mutex);
>> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static void __exit battery_hook_exit(void)
>> * need to remove the hooks.
>> */
>> list_for_each_entry_safe(hook, ptr, &battery_hook_list, list) {
>> - __battery_hook_unregister(hook, 1);
>> + battery_hook_unregister(hook);
>> }
>> mutex_destroy(&hook_mutex);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.39.5
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists