[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cykhg8y7.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:29:52 -0700
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: "Okanovic, Haris" <harisokn@...zon.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org"
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ankur.a.arora@...cle.com"
<ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
"joao.m.martins@...cle.com"
<joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com"
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com"
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"cl@...two.org" <cl@...two.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"arnd@...db.de"
<arnd@...db.de>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"will@...nel.org"
<will@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>,
"maobibo@...ngson.cn" <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de"
<bp@...en8.de>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com"
<mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/11] arm64: support cpuidle-haltpoll
Okanovic, Haris <harisokn@...zon.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 16:24 -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> Add architectural support for the cpuidle-haltpoll driver by defining
>> arch_haltpoll_*(). Also define ARCH_CPUIDLE_HALTPOLL to allow
>> cpuidle-haltpoll to be selected.
>>
>> Haltpoll uses poll_idle() to do the actual polling. This in turn
>> uses smp_cond_load*() to wait until there's a specific store to
>> a cacheline.
>> In the edge case -- no stores to the cacheline and no interrupt --
>> the event-stream provides the terminating condition ensuring we
>> don't wait forever. But because the event-stream runs at a fixed
>> frequency (configured at 10kHz) haltpoll might spend more time in
>> the polling stage than specified by cpuidle_poll_time().
>>
>> This would only happen in the last iteration, since overshooting the
>> poll_limit means the governor will move out of the polling stage.
>>
>> Tested-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@...zon.com>
>> Tested-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@...itsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> index ef9c22c3cff2..5fc99eba22b2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>> @@ -2415,6 +2415,12 @@ config ARCH_HIBERNATION_HEADER
>> config ARCH_SUSPEND_POSSIBLE
>> def_bool y
>>
>> +config ARCH_CPUIDLE_HALTPOLL
>> + bool "Enable selection of the cpuidle-haltpoll driver"
>> + help
>> + cpuidle-haltpoll allows for adaptive polling based on
>> + current load before entering the idle state.
>> +
>> endmenu # "Power management options"
>>
>> menu "CPU Power Management"
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..91f0be707629
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +
>> +#ifndef _ARCH_HALTPOLL_H
>> +#define _ARCH_HALTPOLL_H
>> +
>> +static inline void arch_haltpoll_enable(unsigned int cpu) { }
>> +static inline void arch_haltpoll_disable(unsigned int cpu) { }
>> +
>> +static inline bool arch_haltpoll_want(bool force)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * Enabling haltpoll requires two things:
>> + *
>> + * - Event stream support to provide a terminating condition to the
>> + * WFE in the poll loop.
>> + *
>> + * - KVM support for arch_haltpoll_enable(), arch_haltpoll_disable().
>> + *
>> + * Given that the second is missing, only allow force loading for
>> + * haltpoll.
>> + */
>> + return force;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.43.5
>>
>
> I applied your patches to master e32cde8d2bd7 and verified same
> performance gains on AWS Graviton.
Great.
> Reviewed-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@...zon.com>
> Tested-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@...zon.com>
Thanks!
--
ankur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists