lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9E708EDA-C28E-40BB-8B5F-703132E95096@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 16:32:34 +0800
From: zhang warden <zhangwarden@...il.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
 Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
 Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
 Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
 live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute



> On Oct 3, 2024, at 23:25, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:59:11PM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>>> This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch modules
>>> are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
>>> function, the implementation with the highest stack order is used,
>>> unless a transition is currently in progress.
>> 
>> This description looks good to me. What's the suggestion of 
>> other maintainers ?
> 
> I like it, though "highest stack order" is still a bit arbitrary, since
> the highest stack order is actually the lowest number.
> 
> -- 
> Josh

How about:

This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch module 
are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
function, the implementation with the biggest 'stack_order' number
is used, unless a transition is currently in progress.

Regards.
Wardenjohn.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ