[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9E708EDA-C28E-40BB-8B5F-703132E95096@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2024 16:32:34 +0800
From: zhang warden <zhangwarden@...il.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute
> On Oct 3, 2024, at 23:25, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:59:11PM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
>>> This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch modules
>>> are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
>>> function, the implementation with the highest stack order is used,
>>> unless a transition is currently in progress.
>>
>> This description looks good to me. What's the suggestion of
>> other maintainers ?
>
> I like it, though "highest stack order" is still a bit arbitrary, since
> the highest stack order is actually the lowest number.
>
> --
> Josh
How about:
This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch module
are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
function, the implementation with the biggest 'stack_order' number
is used, unless a transition is currently in progress.
Regards.
Wardenjohn.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists