linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] livepatch: Add "stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241003152516.fzga2uaivzg57q4s@treble>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:25:16 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: zhang warden <zhangwarden@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] livepatch: Add "stack_order" sysfs attribute

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:59:11PM +0800, zhang warden wrote:
> > This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch modules
> > are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
> > function, the implementation with the highest stack order is used,
> > unless a transition is currently in progress.
> 
> This description looks good to me. What's the suggestion of 
> other maintainers ?

I like it, though "highest stack order" is still a bit arbitrary, since
the highest stack order is actually the lowest number.

-- 
Josh