[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64c560c483f09d90c788eb949890d00f3b94cc87.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 10:43:59 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, Shawn Lin
<shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn
Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, "open
list:PCIE DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:PCIE
DRIVER FOR ROCKCHIP" <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, "moderated
list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, open
list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESET 2/3] PCI: rockchip: Simplify reset control
handling by using reset_control_bulk*() function
On So, 2024-10-06 at 23:54 +0530, Anand Moon wrote:
> Refactor the reset control handling in the Rockchip PCIe driver,
> introducing a more robust and efficient method for assert and
> deassert reset controller using reset_control_bulk*() API. Using the
> reset_control_bulk APIs, the reset handling for the core clocks reset
> unit becomes much simpler.
>
> Spilt the reset controller in two groups as pre the RK3399 TRM.
> After power up, the software driver should de-assert the reset of PCIe PHY,
> then wait the PLL locked by polling the status, if PLL
> has locked, then can de-assert the rest reset simultaneously
> driver need to De-assert the reset pins simultionaly.
>
> PIPE_RESET_N/MGMT_STICKY_RESET_N/MGMT_RESET_N/RESET_N.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> ---
> V6: Add reason for the split of the RESET pins.
> v5: Fix the De-assert reset core as per the TRM
> De-assert the PIPE_RESET_N/MGMT_STICKY_RESET_N/MGMT_RESET_N/RESET_N
> simultaneously.
> v4: use dev_err_probe in error path.
> v3: Fix typo in commit message, dropped reported by.
> v2: Fix compilation error reported by Intel test robot
> fixed checkpatch warning
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 151 +++++--------------------
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 26 +++--
> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> index 2777ef0cb599..87daa3288a01 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
[...]
> @@ -69,55 +69,23 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen > 2)
> rockchip->link_gen = 2;
>
> - rockchip->core_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "core");
> - rockchip->mgmt_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "mgmt");
> - rockchip->mgmt_sticky_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev,
> - rockchip->pipe_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pipe");
> - rockchip->pm_rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pm");
> + err = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_exclusive(dev,
[...]
Why are the reset controls optional now? The commit message doesn't
mention this change.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists