[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <759f82f0-0498-466c-a4c2-a87a86e06315@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 12:51:05 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
rmikey@...a.com, kernel-team@...a.com, horms@...nel.org,
"open list:NETWORKING [IPv4/IPv6]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Optimize IPv6 path in ip_neigh_for_gw()
On 10/4/24 19:37, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:01:29AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 10/4/24 10:27 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
>>> Branch annotation traces from approximately 200 IPv6-enabled hosts
>>> revealed that the 'likely' branch in ip_neigh_for_gw() was consistently
>>> mispredicted. Given the increasing prevalence of IPv6 in modern networks,
>>> this commit adjusts the function to favor the IPv6 path.
>>>
>>> Swap the order of the conditional statements and move the 'likely'
>>> annotation to the IPv6 case. This change aims to improve performance in
>>> IPv6-dominant environments by reducing branch mispredictions.
>>>
>>> This optimization aligns with the trend of IPv6 becoming the default IP
>>> version in many deployments, and should benefit modern network
>>> configurations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
>>> ---
>>> include/net/route.h | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/route.h b/include/net/route.h
>>> index 1789f1e6640b..b90b7b1effb8 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/route.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/route.h
>>> @@ -389,11 +389,11 @@ static inline struct neighbour *ip_neigh_for_gw(struct rtable *rt,
>>> struct net_device *dev = rt->dst.dev;
>>> struct neighbour *neigh;
>>>
>>> - if (likely(rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET)) {
>>> - neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(dev, rt->rt_gw4);
>>> - } else if (rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET6) {
>>> + if (likely(rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET6)) {
>>> neigh = ip_neigh_gw6(dev, &rt->rt_gw6);
>>> *is_v6gw = true;
>>> + } else if (rt->rt_gw_family == AF_INET) {
>>> + neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(dev, rt->rt_gw4);
>>> } else {
>>> neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(dev, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr);
>>> }
>>
>> This is an IPv4 function allowing support for IPv6 addresses as a
>> nexthop. It is appropriate for IPv4 family checks to be first.
>
> Right. In which case is this called on IPv6 only systems?
>
> On my IPv6-only 200 systems, the annotated branch predictor is showing
> it is mispredicted 100% of the time.
perf probe -a ip_neigh_for_gw; perf record -e probe:ip_neigh_for_gw -ag;
perf script
should give you an hint.
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists