lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241008105340.2214-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Oct 2024 18:53:40 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: net: pmtu.sh: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address

On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 14:08:18 -0400 Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> Sorry for bringing up this issue, it recently occurred on my aarch64 kernel
> with blackhole_netdev backported. I tracked it down, and when deleting
> the netns, the path is:
> 
> In cleanup_net():
> 
>   default_device_exit_batch()
>     unregister_netdevice_many()
>       addrconf_ifdown() -> call_rcu(rcu, fib6_info_destroy_rcu) <--- [1]
>     netdev_run_todo()
>       rcu_barrier() <- [2]
>   ip6_route_net_exit() -> dst_entries_destroy(net->ip6_dst_ops) <--- [3]
> 
> In fib6_info_destroy_rcu():
> 
>   dst_dev_put()
>   dst_release() -> call_rcu(rcu, dst_destroy_rcu) <--- [5]
> 
> In dst_destroy_rcu():
>   dst_destroy() -> dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1); <--- [6]
> 
> fib6_info_destroy_rcu() is scheduled at [1], rcu_barrier() will wait
> for fib6_info_destroy_rcu() to be done at [2]. However, another callback
> dst_destroy_rcu() is scheduled() in fib6_info_destroy_rcu() at [5], and
> there's no place calling rcu_barrier() to wait for dst_destroy_rcu() to
> be done. It means dst_entries_add() at [6] might be run later than
> dst_entries_destroy() at [3], then this UAF will trigger the panic.
> 
No more important discoveries than this one in the net core so far in 2024.

Thanks
Hillf

> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:02 PM Naresh Kamboju
> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 17:55, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 1:52 PM Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:29:57 +0200 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 5:57=E2=80=AFAM Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
> > > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:12:30 +0200 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> > > > > > > --- a/net/core/dst.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/net/core/dst.c
> > > > > > > @@ -163,8 +163,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dst_dev_put);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  void dst_release(struct dst_entry *dst)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -       if (dst && rcuref_put(&dst->__rcuref))
> > > > > > > +       if (dst && rcuref_put(&dst->__rcuref)) {
> > > > > > > +               if (!(dst->flags & DST_NOCOUNT)) {
> > > > > > > +                       dst->flags |= DST_NOCOUNT;
> > > > > > > +                       dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1);
> > > > > >
> So I think it makes sense to NOT call dst_entries_add() in the path
> dst_destroy_rcu() -> dst_destroy(), as it does on the patch above,
> but I don't see it get posted.
> 
> Hi, Eric, would you like to move forward with your patch above ?
> 
> Or we can also move the dst_entries_add(dst->ops, -1) from dst_destroy()
> to dst_release():
> 
> Note, dst_destroy() is not used outside net/core/dst.c, we may delete
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dst_destroy) in the future.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> > > > > > Could this add happen after the rcu sync above?
> > > > > >
> > > > > I do not think so. All dst_release() should happen before netns removal.
> > > >
> > > >         cpu2                    cpu3
> > > >         ====                    ====
> > > >         cleanup_net()           __sys_sendto
> > > >                                 sock_sendmsg()
> > > >                                 udpv6_sendmsg()
> > > >         synchronize_rcu();
> > > >                                 dst_release()
> > > >
> > > > Could this one be an exception?
> > >
> > > No idea what you are trying to say.
> > >
> > > Please give exact locations, instead of being rather vague.
> > >
> > > Note that an UDP socket can not send a packet while its netns is dismantled,
> > > because alive sockets keep a reference on the netns.
> >
> > Gentle reminder.
> > This is still an open issue.
> >
> > # selftests: net: pmtu.sh
> > # TEST: ipv4: PMTU exceptions                                         [ OK ]
> > # TEST: ipv4: PMTU exceptions - nexthop objects                       [ OK ]
> > # TEST: ipv6: PMTU exceptions                                         [ OK ]
> > # TEST: ipv6: PMTU exceptions - nexthop objects                       [ OK ]
> > # TEST: ICMPv4 with DSCP and ECN: PMTU exceptions                     [ OK ]
> > # TEST: ICMPv4 with DSCP and ECN: PMTU exceptions - nexthop objects   [ OK ]
> > # TEST: UDPv4 with DSCP and ECN: PMTU exceptions                      [ OK ]
> > # TEST: UDPv4 with DSCP and ECN: PMTU exceptions - nexthop objects    [ OK ]
> > # TEST: IPv4 over vxlan4: PMTU exceptions                             [ OK ]
> > # TEST: IPv4 over vxlan4: PMTU exceptions - nexthop objects           [ OK ]
> > # TEST: IPv6 over vxlan4: PMTU exceptions                             [ OK ]
> > # TEST: IPv6 over vxlan4: PMTU exceptions - nexthop objects           [ OK ]
> > # TEST: IPv4 over vxlan6: PMTU exceptions                             [ OK ]
> > <1>[  155.820793] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual
> > address ffff247020442000
> > <1>[  155.821495] Mem abort info:
> > <1>[  155.821719]   ESR = 0x0000000097b58004
> > <1>[  155.822046]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > <1>[  155.822412]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > <1>[  155.822648]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > <1>[  155.822925]   FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> > <1>[  155.823317] Data abort info:
> > <1>[  155.823590]   Access size = 4 byte(s)
> > <1>[  155.823886]   SSE = 1, SRT = 21
> > <1>[  155.824167]   SF = 1, AR = 0
> > <1>[  155.824450]   CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> > <1>[  155.824847]   GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> > <1>[  155.825345] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000041d84000
> > <1>[  155.827244] [ffff247020442000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
> > <0>[  155.828511] Internal error: Oops: 0000000097b58004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > <4>[  155.829155] Modules linked in: vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel
> > act_csum libcrc32c act_pedit cls_flower sch_prio veth vrf macvtap
> > macvlan tap crct10dif_ce sm3_ce sm3 sha3_ce sha512_ce sha512_arm64
> > fuse drm backlight dm_mod ip_tables x_tables [last unloaded:
> > test_blackhole_dev]
> > <4>[  155.832289] CPU: 0 PID: 15 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6 #1
> > <4>[  155.832896] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > <4>[  155.833927] pstate: 824000c9 (Nzcv daIF +PAN -UAO +TCO -DIT
> > -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > <4>[  155.834496] pc : percpu_counter_add_batch+0x24/0xcc
> > <4>[  155.835735] lr : dst_destroy+0x44/0x1e4
> >
> > Links:
> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.6-rc6/testrun/20613439/suite/log-parser-test/test/check-kernel-oops/log
> > - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.6-rc6/testrun/20613439/suite/log-parser-test/tests/
> >
> > - Naresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ