lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4276433b-976e-4e27-9568-ab02e6759905@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:03:06 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1.y 1/5] erofs: get rid of erofs_inode_datablocks()



On 2024/10/8 18:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 02:57:04PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> commit 4efdec36dc9907628e590a68193d6d8e5e74d032 upstream.
>>
>> erofs_inode_datablocks() has the only one caller, let's just get
>> rid of it entirely.  No logic changes.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
>> Stable-dep-of: 9ed50b8231e3 ("erofs: fix incorrect symlink detection in fast symlink")
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230204093040.97967-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
>> [ Gao Xiang: apply this to 6.6.y to avoid further backport twists
>>               due to obsoleted EROFS_BLKSIZ. ]
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> Obsoleted EROFS_BLKSIZ impedes efforts to backport
>>   9ed50b8231e3 ("erofs: fix incorrect symlink detection in fast symlink")
>>   9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
>>
>> To avoid further bugfix conflicts due to random EROFS_BLKSIZs
>> around the whole codebase, just backport the dependencies for 6.1.y.
> 
> all now queued up, thanks.

Thanks Greg, I'd like to avoid obsoleted EROFS_BLKSIZ
conflicts for 6.1.y anymore (and just a few dependencies
to avoid this), so that will save the future bugfix
backport efforts around the 6.1.y codebase.

For more older stable versions, I will manually handle
conflicts later since more non-trivial dependencies need
otherwise but I think bugfixes for older stable versions
will become fewer and fewer...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> greg k-h


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ