linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZwanGrWs3PI4X7OZ@p14s>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:54:02 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: "Everest K.C." <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, corbet@....net, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fix spelling error in remoteproc.rst

Good morning,

This is a case of old english vs. new english.  Using "implementors" is still
correct.  Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the
kernel tree.  Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move
forward with this patch.

Thanks,
Mathieu

On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:15:57AM -0600, Everest K.C. wrote:
> Following spelling error reported by codespell
> was fixed:
> 	implementors ==> implementers
> 
> Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@...restkc.com.np>
> ---
>  Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> index 348ee7e508ac..5c226fa076d6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Typical usage
>  	rproc_shutdown(my_rproc);
>    }
>  
> -API for implementors
> +API for implementers
>  ====================
>  
>  ::
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>