[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoL5ZB45s6sgxDusjXk6PhUCA6U-n73XGZGHbvwCtVrLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 17:54:53 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>,
Vedang Nagar <quic_vnagar@...cinc.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <quic_kdybcio@...cinc.com>, Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
"Bryan O'Donoghue" <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>, Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>, Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] OPP: Rework _set_required_devs() to manage a
single device per call
On Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 17:48, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09-10-24, 15:55, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 at 09:14, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 02-10-24, 14:22, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > > /**
> > > > * struct opp_config_data - data for set config operations
> > > > * @opp_table: OPP table
> > > > * @flags: OPP config flags
> > > > + * @index: The position in the array of required_devs
> > > > *
> > > > * This structure stores the OPP config information for each OPP table
> > > > * configuration by the callers.
> > > > @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ extern struct list_head opp_tables;
> > > > struct opp_config_data {
> > > > struct opp_table *opp_table;
> > > > unsigned int flags;
> > > > + unsigned int index;
> > >
> > > Maybe name this required_dev_index as well ?
> >
> > Sure!
> >
> > Did you manage to get some time to look at the other patches in the series yet?
>
> Ahh, they looked okay and most of them were already Acked by me I guess :)
Right, it was mostly patch 3 and patch4 that I would appreciate an
ack/reviewed-by tag from you.
If I make the rename to "required_dev_index" according to your
suggestion above, it sounds like I could add the acks from you?
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
No worries!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists