[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241009085021.cw9147B8@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 10:50:21 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com,
efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: Add Lazy preemption model
On 2024-10-07 09:46:11 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1103,6 +1106,32 @@ void resched_curr(struct rq *rq)
…
> +static __always_inline int tif_need_resched_lazy(void)
The naming is a bit confusing here because tif_need_resched() checks if
the TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set while this returns the proper TIF bit
instead.
> +{
> + if (dynamic_preempt_lazy())
> + return TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY;
> +
> + return TIF_NEED_RESCHED;
> +}
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists