lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <172865347670.3898502.17710275321530341071.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:31:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: shengjiu.wang@...il.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com, festevam@...il.com, 
 nicoleotsuka@...il.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, 
 alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_esai: change dev_warn to dev_dbg in irq
 handler

On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 12:53:53 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> Irq handler need to be executed as fast as possible, so
> the log in irq handler is better to use dev_dbg which needs
> to be enabled when debugging.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_esai: change dev_warn to dev_dbg in irq handler
      commit: 54c805c1eb264c839fa3027d0073bb7f323b0722

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ