[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZwlboA9JCgLJrOG2@debug.ba.rivosinc.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:08:48 -0700
From: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFT 1/3] mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 11:33:24AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 05:32:03PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
>> From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>>
>> Since multiple architectures have support for shadow stacks and we need to
>> select support for this feature in several places in the generic code
>> provide a generic config option that the architectures can select.
>>
>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>
>> ---
>
>You need to add your own signoff when resending things (though I guess
>this is likely to get applied to a tree that already contains this
>patch so it likely doesn't matter in the end).
oops :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists