linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] iio: adc: ad7606: Disable PWM usage for non backend version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241012134833.31531e18@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:48:33 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
Cc: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>, Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
 <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Rob
 Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
 Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, aardelean@...libre.com, dlechner@...libre.com,
 jstephan@...libre.com, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] iio: adc: ad7606: Disable PWM usage for non
 backend version

On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:45:40 +0200
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2024-10-09 at 09:19 +0000, Guillaume Stols wrote:
> > Since the pwm was introduced before backend, there was a mock use, with
> > a GPIO emulation. Now that iio backend is introduced, the mock use can
> > be removed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@...libre.com>
> > ---  
> 
> Maybe this was agreed on the previous iterations but I wonder if we shouldn't just
> bring PWM support in the same patch as backend support is added...
> 

I can't remember why we ended up in this position (might have been me
who asked for it!) but I'm fine with the logical steps we have in the
series, and it will all merge together. So probably not worth rethinking
now!

I took another look and other than the stuff Nuno has raised this series
looks good to me.

Figures crossed for v5 :)

Jonathan

> - Nuno Sá
> 
> 
>