[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b13dc40b-cb72-02f6-0379-358499696eb2@marek.ca>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 15:22:00 -0400
From: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] efi/libstub: fix efi_parse_options() ignoring the
default command line
On 10/13/24 1:30 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 at 07:16, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca> wrote:
>>
>> v2:
>> - changed to check for NUL character instead of size==1
>> - reworked cleanup patch to remove cmd_line_len
>> - moved 3rd commit out of this series
>>
>> Jonathan Marek (2):
>> efi/libstub: fix efi_parse_options() ignoring the default command line
>> efi/libstub: remove unnecessary cmd_line_len from
>> efi_convert_cmdline()
>>
>
> Thanks. I'm inclined to fold these together and just merge them as a
> single patch. Any objections?
>
No objections (its not important to me, but if you want to get the fix
into stable I think the separate commits makes that easier?)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists