[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202410131726.Gi9qvUP8-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 17:54:43 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com,
efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched: warn for high latency with
TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
Hi Ankur,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on paulmck-rcu/dev]
[also build test ERROR on powerpc/next powerpc/fixes tip/sched/core linus/master v6.12-rc2 next-20241011]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ankur-Arora/sched-warn-for-high-latency-with-TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY/20241010-005819
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009165411.3426937-2-ankur.a.arora%40oracle.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/7] sched: warn for high latency with TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241013/202410131726.Gi9qvUP8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241013/202410131726.Gi9qvUP8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410131726.Gi9qvUP8-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/sched/core.c:5528:27: error: call to undeclared function 'tif_need_resched_lazy'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
5528 | if ((!need_resched() && !tif_need_resched_lazy()) || !latency_warn_ms)
| ^
kernel/sched/core.c:5528:27: note: did you mean 'tif_need_resched'?
include/linux/thread_info.h:182:29: note: 'tif_need_resched' declared here
182 | static __always_inline bool tif_need_resched(void)
| ^
1 error generated.
vim +/tif_need_resched_lazy +5528 kernel/sched/core.c
5517
5518 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
5519 static u64 cpu_resched_latency(struct rq *rq)
5520 {
5521 int latency_warn_ms = READ_ONCE(sysctl_resched_latency_warn_ms);
5522 u64 resched_latency, now = rq_clock(rq);
5523 static bool warned_once;
5524
5525 if (sysctl_resched_latency_warn_once && warned_once)
5526 return 0;
5527
> 5528 if ((!need_resched() && !tif_need_resched_lazy()) || !latency_warn_ms)
5529 return 0;
5530
5531 if (system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING)
5532 return 0;
5533
5534 if (!rq->last_seen_need_resched_ns) {
5535 rq->last_seen_need_resched_ns = now;
5536 rq->ticks_without_resched = 0;
5537 return 0;
5538 }
5539
5540 rq->ticks_without_resched++;
5541 resched_latency = now - rq->last_seen_need_resched_ns;
5542 if (resched_latency <= latency_warn_ms * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
5543 return 0;
5544
5545 warned_once = true;
5546
5547 return resched_latency;
5548 }
5549
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists