lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014174817.i4yrjozmfbdrm3md@thinkpad>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:18:17 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@...cinc.com>, kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com,
	lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_krichai@...cinc.com,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: starfive: Enable PCIe controller's runtime PM
 before probing host bridge

On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 12:23:21PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:26:07AM -0700, Mayank Rana wrote:
> > PCIe controller device (i.e. PCIe starfive device) is parent to PCIe host
> > bridge device. To enable runtime PM of PCIe host bridge device (child
> > device), it is must to enable parent device's runtime PM to avoid seeing
> > the below warning from PM core:
> > 
> > pcie-starfive 940000000.pcie: Enabling runtime PM for inactive device
> > with active children
> > 
> > Fix this issue by enabling starfive pcie controller device's runtime PM
> > before calling pci_host_probe() in plda_pcie_host_init().
> > 
> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mayank Rana <quic_mrana@...cinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> 
> I want this in the same series as Krishna's patch to turn on runtime
> PM of host bridges.  That's how I know they need to be applied in
> order.  If they're not in the same series, they're likely to be
> applied out of order.

There is no harm in applying this patch on its own. It fixes a legit issue of
enabling the parent runtime PM before the child as required by the PM core. Rest
of the controller drivers follow the same pattern.

I fail to understand why you want this to be combined with Krishna's patch. That
patch is only a trigger, but even without that patch the issue still exists (not
user visible ofc).

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ