[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241014224026.1838525-1-ezulian@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:40:26 +0200
From: Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com>
To: corbet@....net
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] docs/core-api: swiotlb: fix typos
Correct references to swiotlb_tbl_map_single() and
swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() in the documentation for swiotlb.
Fix two small typos that went unnoticed in commit c93f261dfc39
("Documentation/core-api: add swiotlb documentation"):
swiotlb_tlb_map_single --> swiotlb_tbl_map_single
swiotbl_tlb_unmap_single --> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
Signed-off-by: Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com>
---
Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst b/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
index cf06bae44ff8..9e0fe027dd3b 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
@@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ slot set.
Fourth, the io_tlb_slot array keeps track of any "padding slots" allocated to
meet alloc_align_mask requirements described above. When
-swiotlb_tlb_map_single() allocates bounce buffer space to meet alloc_align_mask
+swiotlb_tbl_map_single() allocates bounce buffer space to meet alloc_align_mask
requirements, it may allocate pre-padding space across zero or more slots. But
-when swiotbl_tlb_unmap_single() is called with the bounce buffer address, the
+when swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() is called with the bounce buffer address, the
alloc_align_mask value that governed the allocation, and therefore the
allocation of any padding slots, is not known. The "pad_slots" field records
the number of padding slots so that swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() can free them.
--
2.46.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists