[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bjzi3fl2.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:38:01 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/core-api: swiotlb: fix typos
Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com> writes:
> Correct references to swiotlb_tbl_map_single() and
> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() in the documentation for swiotlb.
>
> Fix two small typos that went unnoticed in commit c93f261dfc39
> ("Documentation/core-api: add swiotlb documentation"):
> swiotlb_tlb_map_single --> swiotlb_tbl_map_single
> swiotbl_tlb_unmap_single --> swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single
>
> Signed-off-by: Eder Zulian <ezulian@...hat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst b/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
> index cf06bae44ff8..9e0fe027dd3b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/swiotlb.rst
> @@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ slot set.
>
> Fourth, the io_tlb_slot array keeps track of any "padding slots" allocated to
> meet alloc_align_mask requirements described above. When
> -swiotlb_tlb_map_single() allocates bounce buffer space to meet alloc_align_mask
> +swiotlb_tbl_map_single() allocates bounce buffer space to meet alloc_align_mask
> requirements, it may allocate pre-padding space across zero or more slots. But
> -when swiotbl_tlb_unmap_single() is called with the bounce buffer address, the
> +when swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single() is called with the bounce buffer address, the
Wow ... that seems like the kind of function naming that is just
designed to cause errors of this type. Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists