[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uH6gZjHUes_K=t_R5_o2i9LevifU6mz3kaUbQS0pK6wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:33:57 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/22] media: rzg2l-cru: Remove unnecessary WARN_ON
check in format func
Hi Laurent,
Thank you for the review.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 11:22 AM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 06:30:40PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > `WARN_ON(!fmt)` check in `rzg2l_cru_format_bytesperline()` is unnecessary
> > because the `rzg2l_cru_format_align()` function ensures that a valid
> > `pixelformat` is set before calling `rzg2l_cru_format_bytesperline()`. As
> > a result, `rzg2l_cru_format_from_pixel()` is guaranteed to return a
> > non-NULL value, making the check redundant.
> >
> > Additionally, the return type of `rzg2l_cru_format_bytesperline()` is
> > `u32`, but the code returned `-EINVAL`, a negative value. This mismatch is
> > now resolved by removing the invalid error return path.
>
> s/now /now /
>
Oops, I will drop the extra space.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists