[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <420692d5-d968-4e47-9eaf-14d574b62593@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 11:13:43 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: SEO HOYOUNG <hy50.seo@...sung.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
kwangwon.min@...sung.com, kwmad.kim@...sung.com, sh425.lee@...sung.com,
quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com, cpgs@...sung.com, h10.kim@...sung.com,
grant.jung@...sung.com, junwoo80.lee@...sung.com, wkon.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] scsi: ufs: core: reflect function execution result
in return
On 10/10/24 12:52 AM, SEO HOYOUNG wrote:
> If an error is returned in the power mode function, it is returned and
> modified to cause failure in the UFS linkup.
> If it is an asymmetric connected lane, the UFS init can fail because it is
> an incorrect situation.
Why is this an incorrect situation? If ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode() fails,
won't communication succeed with a lower power mode than maximum power?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists