linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: change remaining printk to proper api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241015213822.8070-1-rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:38:22 -0300
From: Rodrigo Gobbi <rodrigo.gobbi.7@...il.com>
To: dan.carpenter@...aro.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
	philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com,
	rodrigo.gobbi.7@...il.com,
	~lkcamp/patches@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: change remaining printk to proper api

> No, this isn't right.  You'd need to use a mix of dev_dbg() and pr_cont().
> Basically in drivers it should always be dev_ printks except for pr_cont().

Tks, Dan, for the answer and suggestion. In this case, rather the dev_xxx(),
do you think we can go with netdev_dbg() since this is a network driver and around
the rtw_mlme_ext.c is already being used? (actually, I don't see a direct reference for struct device).
If yes, I would mix the netdev_dbg() and pr_cont().

About [2], it is acceptable to remove the statements like I'm proposing?
Tks and regards.

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20241015014738.41685-1-rodrigo.gobbi.7@gmail.com/T/#m85d88af4dd8158a8e62ccb6c7257478b7de46d95