linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kfifo: don't include dma-mapping.h in kfifo.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60488994-e8bc-4f50-a592-8dc539d396d7@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 10:19:05 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: stefani@...bold.net, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfifo: don't include dma-mapping.h in kfifo.h

On 15. 10. 24, 9:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 09:53:52AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> DMA_MAPPING_ERROR is never used by kfifo.h itself.  It is used
>>> by user of the header that instanciate one of the macros that use
>>> it.
>>
>> Well, I don't understand. Looking at:
>> #define kfifo_dma_in_prepare(fifo, sgl, nents, len) \
>>          kfifo_dma_in_prepare_mapped(fifo, sgl, nents, len,
>> DMA_MAPPING_ERROR)
>>
>> You'd have to include dma-mapping.h if you used this macro.
> 
> Yes, obviously.
> 
>> Even though you
>> do not explicitly use any other def from the dma header.
> 
> Sure.
> 
>> Well, this is not a definition of self-containment.
> 
> Yes, it is the exact definition of it.

Then it depends on which one, apparently.

So I disagree, but I don't mind either (meaning: I don't oppose to the 
patch any longer either).

>> If you use every macro
>> from a header and it does not need any other include, then it is
>> self-contained.
> 
> No, that goes way beyond the self containedness.  In fact these days
> the main reason to use macros is exactly to avoid these kinds of
> dependencies.


-- 
js
suse labs