linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241016130924.GB1152434@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:09:24 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the regulator tree

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 08:55:10AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > > The following commits are also in the mfd tree as different commits
> > > (but the same patches):
> 
> > >   d7a5f27342a8 ("mfd: sec-core: add s2dos05 support")
> > >   ef9690c04f3b ("dt-bindings: mfd: add samsung,s2dos05")
> 
> > And these ones do not follow the style expected by the subsystem.
> 
> > Mark can you please remove these without reverting and further dirtying
> > MFD's history please?  One little rebase isn't going to hurt in the long
> > run. :)
> 
> There's additional stuff on top of them now and I'm not clear that the
> regulator patch would build without the MFD.  I don't understand why you
> said to apply the patches after I'd reviewed the regulator patch,
> usually you insist on waiting until all other subsystems have reviewed
> before applying the MFD cores :(

I said to apply the regulator patch because it looked like it didn't
have any dependencies.  The latter part was my mistake as now I see that
it did have deps.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]