[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c7abf59-588b-4679-8638-7e9985f133d1@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 19:50:36 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "andi.shyti@...nel.org" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "lee@...nel.org"
<lee@...nel.org>, "sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
"tsbogend@...ha.franken.de" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"markus.stockhausen@....de" <markus.stockhausen@....de>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: Add Realtek RTL9300 switch
peripherals
On 16/10/24 19:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:59:45AM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + oneOf:
>> + - items:
>> + - enum:
>> + - realtek,rtl9302b-i2c
>> + - realtek,rtl9302c-i2c
>> + - realtek,rtl9303-i2c
>> + - const: realtek,rtl9301-i2c
>> + - const: realtek,rtl9301-i2c
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + description: Register offset and size this I2C controller.
>> +
>> + "#address-cells":
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + "#size-cells":
>> + const: 0
>> +
>> +patternProperties:
>> + '^i2c@[0-7]$':
>> + $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml
>> + unevaluatedProperties: false
>> +
>> + properties:
>> + reg:
>> + description: The SDA pin associated with the I2C bus.
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + required:
>> + - reg
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> +
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> This has to be: additionalProperties: false
Hmm, when I do that the dt_binding_check complains
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
ethernet-switch@...00000: i2c@36c:i2c@0: '#address-cells',
'#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
ethernet-switch@...00000: i2c@36c:i2c@2: '#address-cells',
'#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
ethernet-switch@...00000: i2c@388:i2c@7: '#address-cells',
'#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
i2c@36c: i2c@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match
any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
i2c@36c: i2c@2: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match
any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
i2c@388: i2c@7: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match
any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml#
Those properties should be getting defined via the i2c-controller.yaml
schema so I must be missing something, I'm just not sure what.
>
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + i2c@36c {
>> + compatible = "realtek,rtl9301-i2c";
>> + reg = <0x36c 0x14>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + i2c@0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + gpio@20 {
>> + compatible = "nxp,pca9555";
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + reg = <0x20>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + i2c@2 {
>> + reg = <2>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + gpio@20 {
>> + compatible = "nxp,pca9555";
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + reg = <0x20>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> + i2c@388 {
>> + compatible = "realtek,rtl9301-i2c";
>> + reg = <0x388 0x14>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + i2c@7 {
>> + reg = <7>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + };
>> + };
> Yoy have now multiple same examples. Keep only one, complete in the parent
> schema.
OK. I'll keep one example of a controller with a non-zero channel in the
i2c binding and leave a more complete example in the mfd.
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..f053303ab1e6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists