[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c5f93d92-6bba-41f7-98e0-1e21d61d5941@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:00:23 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "andi.shyti@...nel.org" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "lee@...nel.org"
<lee@...nel.org>, "sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
"tsbogend@...ha.franken.de" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"markus.stockhausen@....de" <markus.stockhausen@....de>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: Add Realtek RTL9300 switch
peripherals
On 17/10/24 08:50, Chris Packham wrote:
>
> On 16/10/24 19:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 11:59:45AM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + oneOf:
>>> + - items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - realtek,rtl9302b-i2c
>>> + - realtek,rtl9302c-i2c
>>> + - realtek,rtl9303-i2c
>>> + - const: realtek,rtl9301-i2c
>>> + - const: realtek,rtl9301-i2c
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + description: Register offset and size this I2C controller.
>>> +
>>> + "#address-cells":
>>> + const: 1
>>> +
>>> + "#size-cells":
>>> + const: 0
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> + '^i2c@[0-7]$':
>>> + $ref: /schemas/i2c/i2c-controller.yaml
>>> + unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> + properties:
>>> + reg:
>>> + description: The SDA pin associated with the I2C bus.
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + required:
>>> + - reg
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> +
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>> This has to be: additionalProperties: false
>
> Hmm, when I do that the dt_binding_check complains
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
> ethernet-switch@...00000: i2c@36c:i2c@0: '#address-cells',
> '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match any of the regexes:
> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> from schema $id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
> ethernet-switch@...00000: i2c@36c:i2c@2: '#address-cells',
> '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match any of the regexes:
> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> from schema $id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
> ethernet-switch@...00000: i2c@388:i2c@7: '#address-cells',
> '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not match any of the regexes:
> 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> from schema $id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
> i2c@36c: i2c@0: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not
> match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> from schema $id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
> i2c@36c: i2c@2: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not
> match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> from schema $id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.example.dtb:
> i2c@388: i2c@7: '#address-cells', '#size-cells', 'gpio@20' do not
> match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> from schema $id:
> http://devicetree.org/schemas/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml#
>
> Those properties should be getting defined via the i2c-controller.yaml
> schema so I must be missing something, I'm just not sure what.
Silly me. I removed the wrong unevaluatedProperties. If I fix up the one
you actually pointed out it's fine. v7 coming soon.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + i2c@36c {
>>> + compatible = "realtek,rtl9301-i2c";
>>> + reg = <0x36c 0x14>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + i2c@0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + gpio@20 {
>>> + compatible = "nxp,pca9555";
>>> + gpio-controller;
>>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>> + reg = <0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + i2c@2 {
>>> + reg = <2>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + gpio@20 {
>>> + compatible = "nxp,pca9555";
>>> + gpio-controller;
>>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>>> + reg = <0x20>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + };
>>> + i2c@388 {
>>> + compatible = "realtek,rtl9301-i2c";
>>> + reg = <0x388 0x14>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> +
>>> + i2c@7 {
>>> + reg = <7>;
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + };
>>> + };
>> Yoy have now multiple same examples. Keep only one, complete in the
>> parent
>> schema.
>
> OK. I'll keep one example of a controller with a non-zero channel in
> the i2c binding and leave a more complete example in the mfd.
>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..f053303ab1e6
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists