linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241016075510.GL8348@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:55:10 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the regulator tree

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the mfd tree as different commits
> (but the same patches):
> 
>   d7a5f27342a8 ("mfd: sec-core: add s2dos05 support")
>   ef9690c04f3b ("dt-bindings: mfd: add samsung,s2dos05")

And these ones do not follow the style expected by the subsystem.

Mark can you please remove these without reverting and further dirtying
MFD's history please?  One little rebase isn't going to hurt in the long
run. :)

> These are commits
> 
>   59d9022639ed ("mfd: sec-core: Add support for the Samsung s2dos05")
>   1d6e7612a129 ("dt-bindings: mfd: Add support for the samsung,s2dos05")
> 
> in the mfd tree.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]