[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcO5g1UerroLaiUa4n7Aj8TPQ594tPGdG-T-xkh4uqyCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 13:22:44 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] vdpa: solidrun: Fix UB bug with devres
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 12:22 PM Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 12:08 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
...
> > > ---
> >
> > I haven't found the reason for resending. Can you elaborate here?
>
> Impatience ;p
>
> This is not a v2.
It doesn't matter, the reviewers and maintainers should get a clue
which version is to be used (even if it's a simple resend) and why it
has been sent.
> I mean, it's a bug, easy to fix and merge [and it's blocking my other
> PCI work, *cough*]. Should contributors wait longer than 8 days until
> resending in your opinion?
Usually we may ping for that. And yeah, depending on the maintainers
it takes a while to get it to the point. In some (quite rare I
believe) cases we may escalate up to Linus about this. I probably has
only one case like that in my full period of working on the Linux
kernel project (several years).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists