linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/15] cxl/pci: Add trace logging for CXL PCIe port RAS errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241017150457.0000538d@Huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:04:57 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
CC: <ming4.li@...el.com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dave@...olabs.net>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>, <oohall@...il.com>,
	<Benjamin.Cheatham@....com>, <rrichter@....com>, <nathan.fontenot@....com>,
	<smita.koralahallichannabasappa@....com>, <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] cxl/pci: Add trace logging for CXL PCIe port RAS
 errors

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:16:55 -0500
Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com> wrote:

> The CXL drivers use kernel trace functions for logging endpoint and
> RCH downstream port RAS errors. However, similar functionality is
> required for CXL root ports, CXL downstream switch ports, and CXL
> upstream switch ports.
> 
> Introduce trace logging functions for both RAS correctable and
> uncorrectable errors specific to CXL PCIe ports. Additionally, update
> the PCIe port error handlers to invoke these new trace functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>

+CC Shiju Jose

Shiju,

Could you check the tracepoints / vs rasdaemon etc

Terry,

Just a patch ordering question from me.

> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c   | 16 ++++++++++----
>  drivers/cxl/core/trace.h | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index 7e3770f7a955..4706113d2582 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -697,10 +697,14 @@ static void __cxl_handle_cor_ras(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	addr = ras_base + CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_OFFSET;
>  	status = readl(addr);
> -	if (status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK) {
> -		writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
> +	if (!(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK))
> +		return;

Add a blank line here to make that early exit easier to spot.

> +	writel(status & CXL_RAS_CORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
> +
> +	if (is_cxl_memdev(dev))
>  		trace_cxl_aer_correctable_error(to_cxl_memdev(dev), status);
So after previous patch, this code will be called for ports without this
check in here?  Perhaps the two patches need to be swapped in order?


However, we already know the type of device at the callers. Maybe just
pass that in here.
> -	}
> +	else if (dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		trace_cxl_port_aer_correctable_error(dev, status);
>  }
>  
>  static void cxl_handle_endpoint_cor_ras(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> @@ -756,7 +760,11 @@ static bool __cxl_handle_ras(struct device *dev, void __iomem *ras_base)
>  	}
>  
>  	header_log_copy(ras_base, hl);
> -	trace_cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error(to_cxl_memdev(dev), status, fe, hl);
> +	if (is_cxl_memdev(dev))
> +		trace_cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error(to_cxl_memdev(dev), status, fe, hl);
> +	else if (dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		trace_cxl_port_aer_uncorrectable_error(dev, status, fe, hl);
> +
>  	writel(status & CXL_RAS_UNCORRECTABLE_STATUS_MASK, addr);
>  
>  	return true;
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h b/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h
> index 9167cfba7f59..6305c0eea627 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/trace.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,34 @@
>  	{ CXL_RAS_UC_IDE_RX_ERR, "IDE Rx Error" }			  \
>  )
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(cxl_port_aer_uncorrectable_error,
> +	    TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, u32 status, u32 fe, u32 *hl),
> +	TP_ARGS(dev, status, fe, hl),
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(devname, dev_name(dev))
> +		__string(host, dev_name(dev->parent))
> +		__field(u32, status)
> +		__field(u32, first_error)
> +		__array(u32, header_log, CXL_HEADERLOG_SIZE_U32)
> +	),
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(devname);
> +		__assign_str(host);
> +		__entry->status = status;
> +		__entry->first_error = fe;
> +		/*
> +		 * Embed the 512B headerlog data for user app retrieval and
> +		 * parsing, but no need to print this in the trace buffer.
> +		 */
> +		memcpy(__entry->header_log, hl, CXL_HEADERLOG_SIZE);
> +	),
> +	TP_printk("device=%s host=%s status: '%s' first_error: '%s'",
> +		  __get_str(devname), __get_str(host),
> +		  show_uc_errs(__entry->status),
> +		  show_uc_errs(__entry->first_error)
> +	)
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error,
>  	TP_PROTO(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u32 status, u32 fe, u32 *hl),
>  	TP_ARGS(cxlmd, status, fe, hl),
> @@ -96,6 +124,25 @@ TRACE_EVENT(cxl_aer_uncorrectable_error,
>  	{ CXL_RAS_CE_PHYS_LAYER_ERR, "Received Error From Physical Layer" }	\
>  )
>  
> +TRACE_EVENT(cxl_port_aer_correctable_error,
> +	TP_PROTO(struct device *dev, u32 status),
> +	TP_ARGS(dev, status),
> +	TP_STRUCT__entry(
> +		__string(devname, dev_name(dev))
> +		__string(host, dev_name(dev->parent))
> +		__field(u32, status)
> +	),
> +	TP_fast_assign(
> +		__assign_str(devname);
> +		__assign_str(host);
> +		__entry->status = status;
> +	),
> +	TP_printk("device=%s host=%s status='%s'",
> +		  __get_str(devname), __get_str(host),
> +		  show_ce_errs(__entry->status)
> +	)
> +);
> +
>  TRACE_EVENT(cxl_aer_correctable_error,
>  	TP_PROTO(const struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd, u32 status),
>  	TP_ARGS(cxlmd, status),