[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<172917782901.2501843.16846439136645084983.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:10:29 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bjorn@...nel.org,
pulehui@...wei.com, puranjay@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, paulmck@...nel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv, bpf: Make BPF_CMPXCHG fully ordered
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:36:28 +0300 you wrote:
> According to the prototype formal BPF memory consistency model
> discussed e.g. in [1] and following the ordering properties of
> the C/in-kernel macro atomic_cmpxchg(), a BPF atomic operation
> with the BPF_CMPXCHG modifier is fully ordered. However, the
> current RISC-V JIT lowerings fail to meet such memory ordering
> property. This is illustrated by the following litmus test:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- riscv, bpf: Make BPF_CMPXCHG fully ordered
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/98cd61955771
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists