linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxBY8S6wO7tymIeC@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:23:13 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, 
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, 
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, 
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, 
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, 
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 10:28:10AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > I suspect the real answer here is that the individual tests here be
> > calling ksft_test_result_pass(), and the system_off2 one should call
> > ksft_test_result_skip() if it skips?
> 
> modulo a few one-offs, KVM selftests doesn't use the kselftest harness
> so it isn't subject to this comment. Since there's no test plan, we can
> skip at any time.

FWIW, I have some ideas on how to use the nicer pieces of kselftest harness, if
anyone is looking for a project.  :-)

https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZjUwqEXPA5QVItyX@google.com