linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v3 0/2] maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20241017001723.82bdd8c48e5be32c4fc70f5d@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:17:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Matthew Wilcox
 <willy@...radead.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sidhartha Kumar
 <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>, Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>, Mikhail
 Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>, maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v3 0/2] maple_tree: correct tree corruption
 on spanning store

On Mon,  7 Oct 2024 16:28:31 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:

> Please note - I am intentionally holding off on cc'ing stable until we've
> had a chance to be satisfied the series has stabilised in 6.12 as this is a
> highly subtle change.

What's the status here?  Should I upstream this?  With cc:stable?