linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v3 0/2] maple_tree: correct tree corruption on spanning store

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bc858008-6c02-4a77-aca4-39a6c62af13b@lucifer.local>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:38:19 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>,
        Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>,
        Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>,
        maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix 6.12 v3 0/2] maple_tree: correct tree corruption
 on spanning store

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:17:23AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  7 Oct 2024 16:28:31 +0100 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > Please note - I am intentionally holding off on cc'ing stable until we've
> > had a chance to be satisfied the series has stabilised in 6.12 as this is a
> > highly subtle change.
>
> What's the status here?  Should I upstream this?  With cc:stable?

Yes please, this very much needs upstreaming, and seems stable so please cc stable also.

Thanks!