lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9e42e6a2-f6ad-4fb5-af9b-72d0c7f6889b@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 07:41:33 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, cem@...nel.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de,
 martin.petersen@...cle.com, catherine.hoang@...cle.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
 ritesh.list@...il.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, brauner@...nel.org,
 djwong@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz,
 dchinner@...hat.com, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] block atomic writes for xfs

On 10/18/24 3:29 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 16/10/2024 11:03, John Garry wrote:
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> There are block changes in this series. I was going to ask Carlos to
> queue this work via the XFS tree, so can you let me know whether you
> have any issue with those (block) changes. There is a fix included,
> which I can manually backport to stable (if not autoselected).
> 
> Note that I still plan on sending a v10 for this series, to fix a
> small documentation issue which Darrick noticed.

To avoid conflicts, let's do a separate branch that we can both pull in.
I'll take a closer look and set that up once you post v10.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ