linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] block atomic writes for xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2eb179a9-9caa-4acd-ae05-41da475cca03@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 18:43:40 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, cem@...nel.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hare@...e.de,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
        mcgrof@...nel.org, ritesh.list@...il.com, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
        brauner@...nel.org, djwong@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        jack@...e.cz, dchinner@...hat.com, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] block atomic writes for xfs

On 18/10/2024 14:41, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> There are block changes in this series. I was going to ask Carlos to
>> queue this work via the XFS tree, so can you let me know whether you
>> have any issue with those (block) changes. There is a fix included,
>> which I can manually backport to stable (if not autoselected).
>>
>> Note that I still plan on sending a v10 for this series, to fix a
>> small documentation issue which Darrick noticed.
> To avoid conflicts, let's do a separate branch that we can both pull in.
> I'll take a closer look and set that up once you post v10.


ok, I'll send v10 soon.

Thanks,
John