linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] selftests/mseal: add more tests for mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <736fefd9-4bce-4aec-a492-2267fdc83776@lucifer.local>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:52:38 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pedro.falcato@...il.com,
        willy@...radead.org, vbabka@...e.cz, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] selftests/mseal: add more tests for mmap

On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 12:32:37PM -0700, Jeff Xu wrote:
> > when they encouter a failure, the pattern I sketched in my earlier
> > message, or switch to kselftest_harness.h (like I say I don't know if
> > the fork()ing is an issue for these tests).  If I had to have a macro
> > it'd probably be something like mseal_assert().
> >
> I can go with mseal_assert, the original macro is used  by mseal_test
> itself, and only intended as such.
>
> If changing name to mseal_assert() is acceptable, this seems to be a
> minimum change and I'm happy with that.

No.