[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1jttd9rein.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:39:28 +0200
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Neil Armstrong
<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Martin
Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski
<brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add support for Amlogic A4
SoCs
On Fri 18 Oct 2024 at 10:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 18/10/2024 10:10, Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
>>
>> Add the new compatible name for Amlogic A4 pin controller, and add
>> a new dt-binding header file which document the detail pin names.
the change does not do what is described here. At least the description
needs updating.
So if the pin definition is now in the driver, does it mean that pins have
to be referenced in DT directly using the made up numbers that are
created in pinctrl-amlogic-a4.c at the beginning of patch #2 ?
If that's case, it does not look very easy a read.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>
>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
Jerome
Powered by blists - more mailing lists