Message-ID: <2f771446-be6a-3b7c-4595-be8c8188145a@linux.dev>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:46:43 +0800
From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@...ux.dev>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yuzhao@...gle.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/codetag: move ref and tag null pointer check to
 alloc_tag_add

Hi Suren


On 10/19/24 01:30, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 9:26 AM Hao Ge <hao.ge@...ux.dev> wrote:
>> From: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
>>
>> When we compile and load lib/slub_kunit.c,it will cause a panic.
>>
>> The root cause is that __kmalloc_cache_noprof was directly called
>> instead of kmem_cache_alloc,which resulted in no alloc_tag being
>> allocated.This caused current->alloc_tag to be null,leading to a
>> null pointer dereference in alloc_tag_ref_set.
>>
>> Despite the fact that my colleague Pei Xiao will later fix the code
>> in slub_kunit.c,we still need to move the null pointer check for ref
>> and tag to alloc_tag_add here.
>> It is sufficient for us to issue a warning to the user;
>> It should not lead to a panic.
>>
>> Here is the log for the panic:
>>
>> [   74.779373][ T2158] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000020
>> [   74.780130][ T2158] Mem abort info:
>> [   74.780406][ T2158]   ESR = 0x0000000096000004
>> [   74.780756][ T2158]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>> [   74.781225][ T2158]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
>> [   74.781529][ T2158]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
>> [   74.781836][ T2158]   FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
>> [   74.782288][ T2158] Data abort info:
>> [   74.782577][ T2158]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
>> [   74.783068][ T2158]   CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
>> [   74.783533][ T2158]   GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
>> [   74.784010][ T2158] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000105f34000
>> [   74.784586][ T2158] [0000000000000020] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
>> [   74.785293][ T2158] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP
>> [   74.785805][ T2158] Modules linked in: slub_kunit kunit ip6t_rpfilter ip6t_REJECT nf_reject_ipv6 ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_conntrack ebtable_nat ebtable_broute ip6table_nat ip6table_mangle 4
>> [   74.790661][ T2158] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2158 Comm: kunit_try_catch Kdump: loaded Tainted: G        W        N 6.12.0-rc3+ #2
>> [   74.791535][ T2158] Tainted: [W]=WARN, [N]=TEST
>> [   74.791889][ T2158] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
>> [   74.792479][ T2158] pstate: 40400005 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>> [   74.793101][ T2158] pc : alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x120/0x270
>> [   74.793607][ T2158] lr : alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x120/0x270
>> [   74.794095][ T2158] sp : ffff800084d33cd0
>> [   74.794418][ T2158] x29: ffff800084d33cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
>> [   74.795095][ T2158] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000012 x24: ffff80007b30e314
>> [   74.795822][ T2158] x23: ffff000390ff6f10 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000088
>> [   74.796555][ T2158] x20: ffff000390285840 x19: fffffd7fc3ef7830 x18: ffffffffffffffff
>> [   74.797283][ T2158] x17: ffff8000800e63b4 x16: ffff80007b33afc4 x15: ffff800081654c00
>> [   74.798011][ T2158] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 205d383531325420 x12: 5b5d383734363537
>> [   74.798744][ T2158] x11: ffff800084d337e0 x10: 000000000000005d x9 : 00000000ffffffd0
>> [   74.799476][ T2158] x8 : 7f7f7f7f7f7f7f7f x7 : ffff80008219d188 x6 : c0000000ffff7fff
>> [   74.800206][ T2158] x5 : ffff0003fdbc9208 x4 : ffff800081edd188 x3 : 0000000000000001
>> [   74.800932][ T2158] x2 : 0beaa6dee1ac5a00 x1 : 0beaa6dee1ac5a00 x0 : ffff80037c2cb000
>> [   74.801656][ T2158] Call trace:
>> [   74.801954][ T2158]  alloc_tagging_slab_alloc_hook+0x120/0x270
>> [   74.802494][ T2158]  __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x148/0x33c
>> [   74.802976][ T2158]  test_kmalloc_redzone_access+0x4c/0x104 [slub_kunit]
>> [   74.803607][ T2158]  kunit_try_run_case+0x70/0x17c [kunit]
>> [   74.804124][ T2158]  kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x2c/0x4c [kunit]
>> [   74.804768][ T2158]  kthread+0x10c/0x118
>> [   74.805141][ T2158]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>> [   74.805540][ T2158] Code: b9400a80 11000400 b9000a80 97ffd858 (f94012d3)
>> [   74.806176][ T2158] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>> [   74.808130][ T2158] Starting crashdump kernel...
>>
>> Fixes: e0a955bf7f61 ("mm/codetag: add pgalloc_tag_copy()")
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@...inos.cn>
>> ---
>> v2: Modify the errors in the title and commit message.
>>      Remove the empty lines that were mistakenly added in version v1.
>> ---
>>   include/linux/alloc_tag.h | 8 ++++----
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/alloc_tag.h b/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>> index 1f0a9ff23a2c..8603e3a9df10 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/alloc_tag.h
>> @@ -137,10 +137,6 @@ static inline void alloc_tag_sub_check(union codetag_ref *ref) {}
>>   /* Caller should verify both ref and tag to be valid */
>>   static inline void __alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag)
>>   {
>> -       alloc_tag_add_check(ref, tag);
>> -       if (!ref || !tag)
>> -               return;
>> -
> Unfortunately this change will result in __alloc_tag_ref_set() and
> alloc_tag_ref_set() missing the following important check from
> alloc_tag_sub_check():
>

Maybe I missed something here, I'm a bit confused. Can you give me an 
example to explain it?

Thanks


Best regards
Hao


> WARN_ONCE(ref && ref->ct,
>    "alloc_tag was not cleared (got tag for %s:%u)\n",
>    ref->ct->filename, ref->ct->lineno);
>
> I think the change below would fix this issue without the above
> mentioned side-effect:
>
> -static inline void __alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct
> alloc_tag *tag)
> +static inline bool __alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct
> alloc_tag *tag)
>   {
>          alloc_tag_add_check(ref, tag);
>          if (!ref || !tag)
> -                return;
> +                return false;
>
>          ref->ct = &tag->ct;
> +        return true;
>   }
>
> -static inline void alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct
> alloc_tag *tag)
> +static inline bool alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct
> alloc_tag *tag)
>   {
> -        __alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag);
> +        if (unlikely(!__alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag)))
> +                return false;
> +
>          /*
>           * We need in increment the call counter every time we have a new
>           * allocation or when we split a large allocation into smaller ones.
>           * Each new reference for every sub-allocation needs to increment call
>           * counter because when we free each part the counter will be
> decremented.
>           */
>          this_cpu_inc(tag->counters->calls);
> +        return true;
>   }
>
>   static inline void alloc_tag_add(union codetag_ref *ref, struct
> alloc_tag *tag, size_t bytes)
>   {
> -        alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag);
> -        this_cpu_add(tag->counters->bytes, bytes);
> +        if (likely(alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag)))
> +                this_cpu_add(tag->counters->bytes, bytes);
>   }
>
> Could you please confirm this fix?
> Thanks,
> Suren.
>
>>          ref->ct = &tag->ct;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -158,6 +154,10 @@ static inline void alloc_tag_ref_set(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *t
>>
>>   static inline void alloc_tag_add(union codetag_ref *ref, struct alloc_tag *tag, size_t bytes)
>>   {
>> +       alloc_tag_add_check(ref, tag);
>> +       if (!ref || !tag)
>> +               return;
>> +
>>          alloc_tag_ref_set(ref, tag);
>>          this_cpu_add(tag->counters->bytes, bytes);
>>   }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists