[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f85a263ed5290fc999d04521f4e70f4c698d9bd3.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:02:24 +0200
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann
<arnd@...db.de>, Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic
<dragan.cvetic@....com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lars Povlsen
<lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund
<Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, Daniel Machon
<daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Andrew
Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Allan
Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>, Luca Ceresoli
<luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add support for the LAN966x PCI device using a
DT overlay
Hi Hervé,
On Mo, 2024-10-21 at 16:41 +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Greg, Philip, Maintainers,
>
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:46:29 +0200
> Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series adds support for the LAN966x chip when used as a PCI
> > device.
> >
> ...
>
> All patches have received an 'Acked-by' and I didn't receive any
> feedback on this v10.
>
> Is there anything that blocks the whole series merge?
>
> Let me know if I need to do something else to have the series applied.
Not that I am aware of. If there are no objections, I'll interpret the
Acked-bys on patch 1 as permission to merge the whole series into
reset/next.
regards
Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists