linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add support for the LAN966x PCI device using a DT overlay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241021173249.297c3ad5@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:32:49 +0200
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Lee Jones
 <lee@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Derek Kiernan
 <derek.kiernan@....com>, Dragan Cvetic <dragan.cvetic@....com>, Greg
 Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Bjorn Helgaas
 <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen
 Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, Daniel Machon
 <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Horatiu Vultur
 <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Allan Nielsen
 <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] Add support for the LAN966x PCI device using a
 DT overlay

Hi Philipp,

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:02:24 +0200
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de> wrote:

...

> > All patches have received an 'Acked-by' and I didn't receive any
> > feedback on this v10.
> >
> > Is there anything that blocks the whole series merge?
> > 
> > Let me know if I need to do something else to have the series applied.  
> 
> Not that I am aware of. If there are no objections, I'll interpret the
> Acked-bys on patch 1 as permission to merge the whole series into
> reset/next.

Seems consistent.

Thanks Philipp.

Best regards,
Hervé