linux-kernel - Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e27ab2c0-ddee-4fc2-a41e-70b4a7775127@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:24:53 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: ksummit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Subject: Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull
 requests

On 10/21/24 9:07 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Current testing:
>    - LKFT: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/sashal-linus-next/
>    - KernelCI: https://t.ly/KEW7F

Hi Sasha,

Is blktests included in any of the above? If not, please consider 
including it. During the past few years we have noticed that the
test failures reported by this test suite are most of the time caused
by kernel bugs. Sometimes issues in the tests are discovered but this
is rare. See also https://github.com/osandov/blktests/.

Thanks,

Bart.