linux-kernel - Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZxaPnk-uC7-A-f_e@sashalap>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 13:30:06 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>
Subject: Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull
 requests

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:24:53AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>On 10/21/24 9:07 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>Current testing:
>>   - LKFT: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/sashal-linus-next/
>>   - KernelCI: https://t.ly/KEW7F
>
>Hi Sasha,
>
>Is blktests included in any of the above? If not, please consider 
>including it. During the past few years we have noticed that the
>test failures reported by this test suite are most of the time caused
>by kernel bugs. Sometimes issues in the tests are discovered but this
>is rare. See also https://github.com/osandov/blktests/.

Hey Bart,

I don't plan on doing any tests on my own, but rather have our existing
CI infra (kernelci, LKFT, etc) deal with the actual testing part of
things.

AFAIK KernelCI if working on adding blktests support!

Thanks!

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha