[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZxX2SVl/p0i7Nemi@tom-HP-ZBook-Fury-15-G7-Mobile-Workstation>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:35:53 +0200
From: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
Paweł Anikiel <panikiel@...gle.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: v4l2-subdev: Refactor events
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your review.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 07:43:54PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tommaso,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 06:35:32PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > Controls can be exposed to userspace via a v4l-subdevX device, and
> > userspace has to be able to subscribe to control events so that it is
> > notified when the control changes value.
> > If a control handler is set for the subdev then set the HAS_EVENTS
> > flag automatically into v4l2_subdev_init_finalize() and use
> > v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event() and v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe()
> > as default if subdev don't have .(un)subscribe control operations.
>
> I would add here
>
> This simplifies subdev drivers by avoiding the need to set the
> V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS flag and plug the event handlers, and ensures
> consistency of the API exposed to userspace.
>
> And you can also add
>
> Suggested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Oks, Thanks again.
>
> Now, can we simplify sensor drivers to drop the event handlers and the
> flag ? :-)
Yep, plan is add all to support v4l2_subdev_init_finalize()
Removing:
.subscribe_event = v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event,
.unsubscribe_event = v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe,
if are used. And ofc V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS.
Meanwhile I think I will send v3 with your
suggestions. :)
Thanks & Regards,
Tommaso
>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Aligned event subscription with unsubscription as suggested by LPinchart,
> > SAilus
> >
> > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> > index 3a4ba08810d2..fad8fa1f63e8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c
> > @@ -691,10 +691,25 @@ static long subdev_do_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, void *arg,
> > return v4l2_event_dequeue(vfh, arg, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK);
> >
> > case VIDIOC_SUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
> > - return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, subscribe_event, vfh, arg);
> > + if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, subscribe_event))
> > + return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, subscribe_event,
> > + vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + if ((sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS) &&
> > + vfh->ctrl_handler)
> > + return v4l2_ctrl_subdev_subscribe_event(sd, vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >
> > case VIDIOC_UNSUBSCRIBE_EVENT:
> > - return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, unsubscribe_event, vfh, arg);
> > + if (v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, core, unsubscribe_event))
> > + return v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, unsubscribe_event,
> > + vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + if (sd->flags & V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS)
> > + return v4l2_event_subdev_unsubscribe(sd, vfh, arg);
> > +
> > + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV_DEBUG
> > case VIDIOC_DBG_G_REGISTER:
> > @@ -1641,6 +1656,9 @@ int __v4l2_subdev_init_finalize(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, const char *name,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (sd->ctrl_handler)
> > + sd->flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_EVENTS;
> > +
> > state = __v4l2_subdev_state_alloc(sd, name, key);
> > if (IS_ERR(state))
> > return PTR_ERR(state);
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists