linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: imx: lpcg-scu: SW workaround for errata (e10858)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zxe2vtwKP0hFrPKV@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:29:18 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: imx: lpcg-scu: SW workaround for errata
 (e10858)

On 24-10-18 18:00:55, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> Back-to-back LPCG writes can be ignored by the LPCG register due to
> a HW bug. The writes need to be separated by at least 4 cycles of
> the gated clock. See https://www.nxp.com.cn/docs/en/errata/IMX8_1N94W.pdf
> 
> The workaround is implemented as follows:
> 1. For clocks running greater than or equal to 24MHz, a read
> followed by the write will provide sufficient delay.
> 2. For clocks running below 24MHz, add a delay of 4 clock cylces
> after the write to the LPCG register.
> 
> Fixes: 2f77296d3df9 ("clk: imx: add lpcg clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c
> index dd5abd09f3e206a5073767561b517d5b3320b28c..cd42190233662c66f2c354f0a2eee3a2531eeb3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c
> @@ -6,10 +6,12 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/units.h>
>  
>  #include "clk-scu.h"
>  
> @@ -41,6 +43,31 @@ struct clk_lpcg_scu {
>  
>  #define to_clk_lpcg_scu(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_lpcg_scu, hw)
>  
> +/* e10858 -LPCG clock gating register synchronization errata */
> +static void lpcg_e10858_writel(unsigned long rate, void __iomem *reg, u32 val)
> +{
> +	u32 reg1;
> +
> +	writel(val, reg);
> +
> +	if (rate >= 24 * HZ_PER_MHZ || rate == 0) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The time taken to access the LPCG registers from the AP core
> +		 * through the interconnect is longer than the minimum delay
> +		 * of 4 clock cycles required by the errata.
> +		 * Adding a readl will provide sufficient delay to prevent
> +		 * back-to-back writes.
> +		 */
> +		reg1 = readl(reg);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * For clocks running below 24MHz, wait a minimum of
> +		 * 4 clock cycles.
> +		 */
> +		ndelay(4 * (DIV_ROUND_UP(1000 * HZ_PER_MHZ, rate)));
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int clk_lpcg_scu_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  {
>  	struct clk_lpcg_scu *clk = to_clk_lpcg_scu(hw);
> @@ -57,7 +84,8 @@ static int clk_lpcg_scu_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  		val |= CLK_GATE_SCU_LPCG_HW_SEL;
>  
>  	reg |= val << clk->bit_idx;
> -	writel(reg, clk->reg);
> +
> +	lpcg_e10858_writel(clk_hw_get_rate(hw), clk->reg, reg);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&imx_lpcg_scu_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -74,7 +102,7 @@ static void clk_lpcg_scu_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>  
>  	reg = readl_relaxed(clk->reg);
>  	reg &= ~(CLK_GATE_SCU_LPCG_MASK << clk->bit_idx);
> -	writel(reg, clk->reg);
> +	lpcg_e10858_writel(clk_hw_get_rate(hw), clk->reg, reg);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&imx_lpcg_scu_lock, flags);
>  }
> @@ -149,9 +177,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused imx_clk_lpcg_scu_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	 * FIXME: Sometimes writes don't work unless the CPU issues
>  	 * them twice
>  	 */
> -
> -	writel(clk->state, clk->reg);

Now that you removed one of the writes, doesn't the comment above has to
be removed as well ?

>  	writel(clk->state, clk->reg);
> +	lpcg_e10858_writel(0, clk->reg, clk->state);
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "restore lpcg state 0x%x\n", clk->state);
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.1
>