lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza_XLALKvOzyc9f22hrXWkvcX7yb=D0W3FUFrAmPAZHHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:40:14 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, 
	rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu] srcu: Guarantee non-negative return value from srcu_read_lock()

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:30 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 07:01:02PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 5:21 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 3:13 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > For almost 20 years, the int return value from srcu_read_lock() has
> > > > > been always either zero or one.  This commit therefore documents the
> > > > > fact that it will be non-negative.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > > > Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > > > > index bab1dae3f69e6..512a8c54ba5ba 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > > > > @@ -238,13 +238,14 @@ void srcu_check_read_flavor(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int read_flavor);
> > > > >   * a mutex that is held elsewhere while calling synchronize_srcu() or
> > > > >   * synchronize_srcu_expedited().
> > > > >   *
> > > > > - * The return value from srcu_read_lock() must be passed unaltered
> > > > > - * to the matching srcu_read_unlock().  Note that srcu_read_lock() and
> > > > > - * the matching srcu_read_unlock() must occur in the same context, for
> > > > > - * example, it is illegal to invoke srcu_read_unlock() in an irq handler
> > > > > - * if the matching srcu_read_lock() was invoked in process context.  Or,
> > > > > - * for that matter to invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the
> > > > > - * matching srcu_read_lock() from another.
> > > > > + * The return value from srcu_read_lock() is guaranteed to be
> > > > > + * non-negative.  This value must be passed unaltered to the matching
> > > > > + * srcu_read_unlock().  Note that srcu_read_lock() and the matching
> > > > > + * srcu_read_unlock() must occur in the same context, for example, it is
> > > > > + * illegal to invoke srcu_read_unlock() in an irq handler if the matching
> > > > > + * srcu_read_lock() was invoked in process context.  Or, for that matter to
> > > > > + * invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the matching srcu_read_lock()
> > > > > + * from another.
> > > >
> > > > For uprobe work I'm using __srcu_read_lock() and __srcu_read_unlock().
> > > > Presumably the same non-negative index will be returned/consumed there
> > > > as well, right? Can we add a blurb to that effect for them as well?
> > >
> > > Does the change shown below cover it?
> >
> > Yep, looks good, thank you! You might want to fix
> > s/srcu_read_unlock/__srcu_read_unlock/, while at it, but that's
> > orthogonal.
>
> As long as we are in the area...  Please see below for the update.
>
> Thoughts?
>

LGTM

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>

>                                                         Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 4433b7d3785d8d2a700f5ed5ca234c64bc63180e
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Date:   Mon Oct 21 15:09:39 2024 -0700
>
>     srcu: Guarantee non-negative return value from srcu_read_lock()
>
>     For almost 20 years, the int return value from srcu_read_lock() has
>     been always either zero or one.  This commit therefore documents the
>     fact that it will be non-negative, and does the same for the underlying
>     __srcu_read_lock().
>
>     [ paulmck: Apply Andrii Nakryiko feedback. ]
>
>     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
>     Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>     Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> index bab1dae3f69e6..512a8c54ba5ba 100644
> --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> @@ -238,13 +238,14 @@ void srcu_check_read_flavor(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int read_flavor);
>   * a mutex that is held elsewhere while calling synchronize_srcu() or
>   * synchronize_srcu_expedited().
>   *
> - * The return value from srcu_read_lock() must be passed unaltered
> - * to the matching srcu_read_unlock().  Note that srcu_read_lock() and
> - * the matching srcu_read_unlock() must occur in the same context, for
> - * example, it is illegal to invoke srcu_read_unlock() in an irq handler
> - * if the matching srcu_read_lock() was invoked in process context.  Or,
> - * for that matter to invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the
> - * matching srcu_read_lock() from another.
> + * The return value from srcu_read_lock() is guaranteed to be
> + * non-negative.  This value must be passed unaltered to the matching
> + * srcu_read_unlock().  Note that srcu_read_lock() and the matching
> + * srcu_read_unlock() must occur in the same context, for example, it is
> + * illegal to invoke srcu_read_unlock() in an irq handler if the matching
> + * srcu_read_lock() was invoked in process context.  Or, for that matter to
> + * invoke srcu_read_unlock() from one task and the matching srcu_read_lock()
> + * from another.
>   */
>  static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
>  {
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 07147efcb64d3..ae17c214e0de5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -738,7 +738,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_check_read_flavor);
>  /*
>   * Counts the new reader in the appropriate per-CPU element of the
>   * srcu_struct.
> - * Returns an index that must be passed to the matching srcu_read_unlock().
> + * Returns a guaranteed non-negative index that must be passed to the
> + * matching __srcu_read_unlock().
>   */
>  int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>  {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ