[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <075d6720-a690-437c-a10f-e2746651e2a8@yoseli.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:42:10 +0200
From: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] m68k: Add tracirqs
Hi Steve,
On 22/10/2024 07:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:44:42 +0200
> Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org> wrote:
>
>> The TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT requires the architecture to call
>> trace_hardirqs_off() when interrupts are disabled and
>> trace_hardirqs_on() when they are enabled.
>> Add those calls to do_IRQ function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org>
>> ---
>> arch/m68k/Kconfig | 1 +
>> arch/m68k/kernel/irq.c | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
>> index cc26df907bfe3c8143a931d259eceabb16af7411..ab3375475721fa63418c40d4ba6ac76679ebc77d 100644
>> --- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config M68K
>> select OLD_SIGSUSPEND3
>> select UACCESS_MEMCPY if !MMU
>> select ZONE_DMA
>> + select TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT
>>
>> config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
>> def_bool y
>> diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/irq.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/irq.c
>> index 9ab4f550342e5de11c528f55781432675ffd66bf..74cf60ebbc4bca51f3caa4046dbd2bdb02355711 100644
>> --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/irq.c
>> +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/irq.c
>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ asmlinkage void do_IRQ(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>> struct pt_regs *oldregs = set_irq_regs(regs);
>>
>> + trace_hardirqs_off();
>> irq_enter();
>> generic_handle_irq(irq);
>> irq_exit();
>> + trace_hardirqs_on();
>
> This part of the patch shouldn't be needed because those shoudl be
> called by irq_enter() and irq_exit(). Does this not work if you don't
> have these?
Thanks for your quick review !
Indeed, it works without those lines, so the patch is now a one-liner
:-). I will wait for the second part to be reviewed before sending v2.
JM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists