linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] m68k: Add tracirqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241022043037.13efb239@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 04:30:37 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] m68k: Add tracirqs

On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:42:10 +0200
Jean-Michel Hautbois <jeanmichel.hautbois@...eli.org> wrote:

> > This part of the patch shouldn't be needed because those shoudl be
> > called by irq_enter() and irq_exit(). Does this not work if you don't
> > have these?  
> 
> Thanks for your quick review !

\o/

> Indeed, it works without those lines, so the patch is now a one-liner 
> :-). I will wait for the second part to be reviewed before sending v2.

I don't know enough about m68k to review that patch. Just incase you
were expecting me to review it.

-- Steve